Research Report
RE 5040, Teacher as Researcher
You will be graded with the same rubric whether you chose to write a report or construct a poster for the poster session. I will use the following guidelines and criteria for grading your product. Since it is worth 40% of the grade, I will assign 40 points, as indicated in the rubric.
|
|
Beginning
|
Developing
|
Accomplished
|
Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Introduction elements: |
Provides basic
overview of the project. Addresses two or fewer elements. Research question
unclearly stated or not stated. |
Provides a comprehensive overview of the project. Addresses at least three elements. Research question clearly stated. |
Provides a
detailed and insigtful explanation of all elements. Addresses all four
elements. Research question provides clear direction for the study. |
|
| Scoring
Continuum |
0 | 6 |
||
| Review of the Literature elements: *Cites relevant studies |
Cites limited studies. Does not build a clear case for project | Cites substantial number of studies. Builds a clear case for the project | Provides an indepth review of studies. Builds a compelling case for the project | |
| Scoring
Continuum |
0 | 4 |
||
Methods elements: *Reports subjects |
Presents an unclear explanation of the methods, addressing two or fewer elements | Presents a clear explanation of the methods, addressing at least three of the elements | Presents a clear and elaborated explanation of the methods, addressing all elements | |
| Scoring
Continuum |
0 | 8 |
||
Results elements: *Provides a clear explanation of the data |
Results are not clearly presented and/or are not presented in an objective way | Results are clearly presented with reasonable objectivity | Results are clearly presented with substantial elaboration and objectivity | |
| Scoring
Continuum |
0 | 6 |
||
Discussion and Results elements: *Returns to the research question to interpret results |
Discussion and Results are not clear and/or tied to data. Explanations of influence on personal practice are limited. Implications for educators are limited. | Discussion and Results are clear and related to data. Influence on practice and implications for educators are discussed | Discussion and results are clear, interesting and supported by the data. Influence on practice and implications for educators are analyzed in depth | |
| Scoring
Continuum |
0 | 8 |
||
| Writer's Craft Creativity, Flow, Organization, Transitions |
Loose organization:
tangential information; lacks introduction and/or conclusion; unfocused
|
Hard to follow
in some places; some reorganization would enhance readability of the
paper; lacks transitions. |
Smooth flow of
ideas, paper is cohesive: includes introduction, conclusion, transitions,
headings and subheadings. |
|
| Scoring
Continuum |
0 | 5 |
||
| Mechanics Grammar, Punctuation, Spelling, APA |
Faulty punctuation; misspellings;
sentence fragments and other mechanical errors, which detract from the
content. |
Some grammatical, puncutation
and APA errors. |
Appropriate punctuation,
sentence and paragraph formation; appropriate use of APA style for references.
|
|
| Scoring
Continuum |
0 | 3 |
||
| Total |